Value judgement: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(moved from Intarese)
 
(moved from Intarese)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Definition of value judgement==
'''Value judgement''' means a preference{{disclink|Definition of value judgement}} for a certain state of the world, expressed by an individual or by a society.
I think that the present definition of "value judgement" should be clarified and perhaps modified/expanded as well. Value judgements (i.e. the expression of one's values) can take several different forms. For example, they can be choices (between possibilities), or statements about the absolute or relative importance (or detriment) of some state of affairs.


A couple of concrete examples would be most welcome here! [[User:Erkki Kuusisto|Erkki Kuusisto]] 17:50, 22 January 2008 (EET)
Risk assessment is about estimating impacts that have positive or negative value judgements attached to themselves or to the determinants that causally affect them. These values must be acknowledged in the process of making the assessments, not only in the risk management phase, otherwise there is a risk of compromising the relevance of the assessment. Combining phenomena of physical reality with the value judgements related to them requires methods to distinguish these two things from each other and bringing the value judgements to explicit scrutiny within an assessment.

Revision as of 20:58, 29 January 2008

Value judgement means a preferenceD↷ for a certain state of the world, expressed by an individual or by a society.

Risk assessment is about estimating impacts that have positive or negative value judgements attached to themselves or to the determinants that causally affect them. These values must be acknowledged in the process of making the assessments, not only in the risk management phase, otherwise there is a risk of compromising the relevance of the assessment. Combining phenomena of physical reality with the value judgements related to them requires methods to distinguish these two things from each other and bringing the value judgements to explicit scrutiny within an assessment.