Benefit-risk assessment of food supplements/Guidance used: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(first draft and todo based on own thinking)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Institute]]
[[Category:Health effects]]
<dpl>
<dpl>
category = Guidance used in PFS
category = Guidance used in PFS
mode = none
include = {guidancelink}:usepage:acceptance:guidance
include = {guidancelink}
table   = ,Page providing guidance,Page using guidance,Acceptance,Guidance
ordermethod=title
format   = ,\n<big>'''[[%PAGE%|%TITLE%]]<span id="%PAGE%"></span>'''</big>,,
notcategory = glossary
order = ascending
</dpl>
</dpl>
{{todo|Update this [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DynamicPageList_(third-party) dpl code] so that it produces the following kind of table. Estimated time: 1 d, salary: 65 €.|Tuukka Hämynen, Pauli Ordén|project=Opasnet}}
{| {{prettytable}}
! Page using guidance
! Page providing guidance
! Acceptance
! Guidance
|----
| [[:heande:Exposure to PFS]]
| [[EFSA: Guidance on human health risk-benefit assessment of foods]]
| green
| The nature of a dietary study affects its usability in exposure assessment. Some guidance is given how to interpret.
|----
| [[:heande:ERF of critical endpoints of PFS]]
| [[EFSA: Guidance on human health risk-benefit assessment of foods]]
| yellow
| Information from randomised controlled trials should be used whenever possible
|}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 15 June 2012


Page providing guidance Page using guidance Acceptance Guidance
EFSA: Guidance on human health risk-benefit assessment of foods :heande:Exposure to PFS accepted The nature of a dietary study affects its usability in exposure assessment. Some guidance is given how to interpret.
EFSA: Guidance on human health risk-benefit assessment of foods :heande:ERF of critical endpoints of PFS modified Information from randomised controlled trials should be used whenever possible